Tag Archives: george zimmerman

George Zimmerman pulled over with 15 Gallons of High Explosive!

George Zimmerman was pulled over for speeding by Texas Law Enforcement.

He was found to be carrying 15 gallons of C8H18.  C8H18 is an extremely dangerous, liquid form, high explosive.

The explosive material was hidden under the bed of his truck accessed by cleverly engineered, built-in, door and stopper located on the outer left side of the vehicle.

Texas Law Enforcement also discovered a receipt in the vehicle, from a personal credit card, showing the recent purchase of the High Explosive, as well as an entire bar containing Glucose and approximately 16 ounces of Hydrogen Dioxide.

The officer was forced to warn Zimmerman for the excess speed.

However, a loophole in Texas law does not forbid the covert transportation of the above explosive or other materials.

What Mr. Zimmerman, a self-identified Hispanic, intended to do with the High Explosive has not been disclosed.

Mr. Zimmerman was allowed to leave, with all the above mentioned materials, without further investigation.

(It should also be noted that Mr. Zimmerman also had a legally licensed hand gun in the glove compartment.)


Run Away! Run Away!

Apparently it’s no longer a laugh line from Monty Python’s Holy Grail.

According to our Attorney General, Eric Holder, it’s “your duty” to retreat when threatened.

Your Duty… to Run Away.

 [ dootee ]
  1. obligation: something that somebody is obliged to do for moral, legal, or religious reasons
 [ thret ]
  1. declaration of intent to cause harm: the expression of an intention to cause harm or pain
  2. sign of something bad: an indication that something unpleasant or dangerous is going to happen
  3. somebody or something likely to cause harm: a person, animal, or thing likely to cause harm or pain

Please take a moment and think about this.

Our Attorney General, who is the legal mouthpiece for the President of the United States, has stated in no uncertain terms that you must retreat when threatened by anyone wishing to do you harm.  And make no mistake… taking your stuff, threatening your well-being, or both, is “doing you harm”.

According to Mr. Holder, you are obligated to give that person, or persons, whatever they want if they demand it.  Could be your Wedding Ring, could be your child, could be your body.

You have no right to protect yourself, or your property, if another individual is willing to harm you.

Sounds to me like it’s “Open Season” on all of us who are not inclined to break the law.  Sounds like a Thug empowerment seminar.  Sounds like pandering for the criminal vote.

The only legitimacy this idea enjoys is born out of the concept that we should leave such matters to the police (the government).  It is a flawed idea.

I respect the police.  It is a difficult and dangerous job.

However, the police are the SECOND line of defense against crime.  They exist to catch criminals AFTER they have committed the crime… as it should be.

YOU are the FIRST line of defense… as it should be.

Why is this?

Because you do not… do not… do not… want to live in a country where there is a police officer on every corner.  These places exist, and judging by the numbers, you don’t even choose to vacation there.

So, this leaves YOU.  And surprisingly unknown to our current leaders, our country was designed that way.  The responsibility to defend ourselves is integral to our freedom and liberty.  In fact, our ability to defend ourselves, and our property, is considered an inalienable right.  Does that phrase sound familiar?  It should.

As you age, and pay attention, it becomes disconcerting when you realize the level of ignorance some of us find acceptable in our leaders.

Or is it ignorance?

Could it be they know exactly what they are saying?

If so, does that make you feel better?