Tag Archives: democrat

Mixing the Kool Aid…

The Democrat National Committee would like you to try out their latest Election Season Cocktail.

They’re filling the Trough as we Speak…  So…

Whip out your Red Solo Cup for a hefty serving of Grape Flavored Medicine.

And of Course,

It’s Free…

(Just make sure to drink it quickly. It tends to have a Bitter Aftertaste.)

Done?  OK… Wipe your mouth.

Here we go:

Is the War on Terror Over?

Is Your Healthcare Cheaper?

Is the National Debt Smaller?

Can you Keep Your Doctor?

Can you Keep Your Insurance Plan?

Is the Economy Better?

Are Prices for everyday things Going Down?

Do you think the Bill of Rights has a Number of Serious Problems?

Do you agree that you’ve never built anything?

Are you Making More Money?

Is Gitmo Closed?

Are all of our Troops Home?

Does North Korea still not have Nuclear Weapons?

Does the Constitution Live and Breathe?

Is Crime Going Down?

Are Race Relations Better?

Is Unemployment Going Down?

Is Russia just Peacefully helping out the Countries around them?

Is Job Creation Going Up?

Are Mom and Pop Businesses Thriving?

Are Welfare Rolls Going Down?

Does Calling yourself a Liberal mean you Care more about Everything?

Do you think Jobs is a three-letter word?

Is Education Getting Cheaper?

Do you believe that the Human Species is not a part of Nature?

Does the World Love us?

Is it Easier to Start A Business?

Do you think all Species on the Planet Today should be Saved except for the ones you don’t like?

Should All Debt be Forgiven?

Is it Cheaper to Travel… Anywhere?

Is Your Privacy being Protected?

Do you think it’s OK your Government is spying on you and saving All of your stuff for Future Use?

Do you Feel More Free?

Is it easier to Voice Your Opinion without Fear?

Do you believe there are 57 States?

Are your Taxes Going Down letting you Keep More of Your Money?

Are you able to Save More?

Are Your Kids Self-Sufficient and Living on Their Own?

Do you think it is a Good Idea for your Government to Sell Guns to Mexican Drug Cartels?

Does any part of ‘Spreading the Wealth Around’ make sense to you?

Is Al Qaeda on the Run?

Are Beheading’s in the Name of Islam typical workplace violence?

Is it OK that Illegal Alien Children are being placed into the Public Schools, where your kids go, without any Medical Screening?

Do you like the Idea that those same Children can choose what school They want to go to, but Your Kids Can’t?

Do you think allowing Millions of New Workers into the United States while Raising the Minimum Wage will Increase Jobs?

Are you pretty sure you’re Smarter than almost everyone except the people you vote for?

If the answer to ANY of the above is ‘No’, you will need to have another Glass…

…and Try Again.

If you have answered ‘Yes’ to all the above, whether it’s true or not, you are Ready to Rock the Vote.

You’ll just need to keep drinking the Kool-Aid for another six weeks until the Election.

Remember, the Liberal Progressive Socialist Democrats are depending on you.


“I’s” and “We’s”

World over there are basically two groups of people, the “I’s” and the “We’s”.

The “I’s” enjoy being alone sometimes.    The “I” see’s their happiness and sustenance as a very personal pursuit and achieving both is not dependant on any other “I” or “We”.  “I’s” accept responsibility for their actions good and bad.  Occasionally they choose to get together and becomes “We’s”.  The “I’s” like to do this because it can be beneficial in solving a problem, but not always.  At the end of the day their true joy is that they can go home and just be an “I”.

An “I” would never seek to force another “I” to be a “We”, or a “We” to be a “We” for that matter.

But…

The “We’s” hate the “I’s”.

The “We’s” see their happiness, and sustenance, dependant upon every other “I” and “We”.   “We’s” think it’s their right to make the “I’s”, and other “We’s”, supply them with this happiness and sustenance.  Because of this, the “We’s” know they can never be happy as long as there are “I’s”.  So the “We’s” constantly look for ways to force the “I’s” to be “We’s” even when the “I’s” don’t want to.

The “We’s” longingly dream of a time when all “I’s” are Forced to be “We’s”.

Are you an “I” or a “We”?


Fighting to be Your Voice

An exchange I had with a friend brought something to mind.

We were discussing Organized Religion’s drive to be the Voice of The People.

Our conversation reinforced my belief that Organized Religion has a tendency, a desire, to be Government.

What I mean by this is The Church is not Fighting For your Voice… They are Fighting to BE your Voice.

This is synonymous with Statist governing Theory and it’s Demand to BE your voice.

Statists expect to be your Agent… in other words, they require the power to make decisions on your behalf, without your knowledge, that you will be liable for.

But it seems what We really want are spokespeople, or rather representatives, who speak Our Mind and execute Our Desires.  These two concepts are not the same.  While having the ability to override our demands… our Representatives would only do so in the very rarest of moments.  And when, if ever, this happens we demand an Explanation as they Work for us and have put us in a position we did not ask to be in.  In turn, They will stand tall to be judged while delivering that which we demand.

Clearly. This is not what we experience now.

I’ve long-held that Marx found compatriots within Europe exactly because his ideas would save the rapidly disenfranchised Aristocracy and Landed Gentry from complete irrelevance.  It’s Telling that Engels, Marx’ Patron, was born of wealth.  It’s also illustrative that many of the wealthy throughout Europe flocked to his ideas… as do much of America’s wealthy do today.

What becomes evident is it’s never been about Social Justice or whatever undefinable platitude you choose.  It’s always been about the Rich retaining their position within Society.  It’s always been about Class Permanence.  And in this regard everywhere Democratic Socialism has been tried it has indeed worked.

I marvel at the Machiavellian Brilliance found in Marx’ ideas in terms of having the Masses support the same Class Stasis they were trying to dismantle.

And without fail… the Masses have succeeded, enthusiastically.  And the Irony is they still don’t understand what’s happened.

But back to the point,

This is the difference between Protecting, and Fighting for, the Individual above all else vs. Protecting, and Fighting for, The Group.

When you ‘fight for the group’ you open yourself up to manipulation by Rich Socialists who have become Professional Manipulators.  This is what the term Useful Idiot means.  When you listen to Rich Liberals tell you how you must change your life and also vote for them again and again, right now, to save the planet, your neighborhood, your family, your vagina, whatever it is you value most… except, of course, your Freedom from Government… and you agree with him without ever asking why he refuses to give up his, you become Useful in the worst way.  It is when you Give Them your Voice that you become a Slave.  And that’s what they want.

It’s easy to comprehend.

Those seeking to protect the Group wish to secure their power as The Voice and remain in that office Forever while providing Their Family, and Their Friends, with the influence and largess the office affords. (Their Friends and Family would expect it… less they would accuse that powerful person of not caring about them.  And of course we want to be liked, loved and grow the power and influence we already have.  All of us want ‘the best’ for those closest to us.  How could you possibly deny Your Child access to medical care that has been structurally denied everyone else if you had the power to do so?  Or, how could you not make sure your Son or Daughter gets that job, even though there are better applicants, when you have the power to ‘make it happen’?  You know this to be true, and it will always be the fatal flaw in every incarnation of Socialism.  Self-Interest from within… and without.  So why do we continue to entertain repeating Marx’ horrid experiment?  But I digress…)

However,

Those seeking to protect the Individual seek nothing else. They do not seek to secure their position to ‘spread the wealth around’ so long as it’s other people’s wealth. They do not seek to expand their power over others ‘to get things done’. They do not seek the office of Representative in order to direct favors to their family and friends.

The latter terrify those now in power exactly because they threaten the legalized theft from the  Masses, as well as jeopardizing the very Scheme embraced by Marx’ patrons 100 yeas ago. The Established System which keeps them in control would be at risk.

Those who seek to protect the Individual understand that the power of Government must be returned to what the Founders intended, which necessitates a Massive reduction.  This reduction would cut the leg’s out from underneath those Liberals, Republican and Democrat, that built their entire Empires on such Power.

Once you recognize this it becomes easier to understand what’s going on in our Country today.


The Terrorist Shuffle

Is…

ISIS, ISIL, IS, Al Qaeda, Taliban, Khorasan Group

taking a page out of the…

Leftist, Liberal, Progressive, Populist, Democrat, Socialist

Playbook?

It appears they are.

The play goes like this; Once they start to figure out Who you are… and they don’t like you, Change your name.

And trust me, when you’re busy oppressing people, they are not going to like you.

You’re going to have a lot of names.

 

What’s in a Name Anyway?


The Far Right and the Far Left

According to Alan Dershowitz, both the Far Right and the Far Left Hate Jews

This is True…

if your entire Political Spectrum is Socialist in Nature.

Because Far Right Socialists AND Far Left Socialists do, in fact, Hate Jews.

Socialists of Every Flavor from NAZI’s to Marxists have long Hated Jews. and many other groups they considered subhuman.

To tell you the truth, Socialists are the most Racist, Anti-Semitic, Elitist Homophobes that walk the Earth.

And yet so much of America still supports them… I guess that’s what makes those American’s “Useful”.


Are AG Holder and Rep. Gohmert (R-TX) Buddies?

Or is Eric Holder just a Smug, Arrogant, Elitist who holds nothing but Contempt for the Separation of Powers?

You Decide.

Transcript of Exchange:

(Background:  At issue was a request for documents in the DOJ’s case against the Holy Land Foundation, a designated terrorist group based in Texas, whose founders were convicted and sentenced for funneling money to Hamas. The men are now asking for a new trial, blaming their lawyers for their convictions. In February, the DOJ disputed their attorney’s claim, saying there was a “mountain of evidence” that proves the Islamic charity was controlled by Hamas.)

“I was fairly specific to make sure that I got the documents that the Department of Justice handed over to people convicted of supporting terrorism. They’re terrorists. We’ve given them the documents,” Gohmert said. Gohmert said the committee sent the Justice Department repeated requests for the documents that had been used to prosecute them but were only provided a link to “nearly 500 publicly available exhibits that were admitted into evidence” and instructed “to check the public access to court electronic records.” Meanwhile, the requested documents were “put on discs and sent to Illinois,” so they are easily available – “just not to members of Congress,” Gohmert said.

“Attorney General, I’ve read in the 5th Circuit opinion, about 9600 summaries of transcripts of conversations that the Justice Department had that were made available to attorneys for the terrorists,” Gohmert said. “I still do not understand why your department can provide documents to terrorists’ lawyers, and many of them to four out of eight of the terrorists, and not provide them to members of Congress.” “Sir, I’ve read you what your department promised, and it is inadequate, and I realize that contempt is not a big deal to our attorney general, but it is important that we have proper oversight,” Gohmert said.

Holder: “You don’t want to go there, buddy. You don’t want to go there, okay?”

Gohmert: “I don’t want to go there?”

Holder: “No.” Gohmert: “About the contempt?”

Holder: “You should not assume that that is not a big deal to me. I think that it was inappropriate. I think it was unjust, but never think that that was not a big deal to me. Don’t ever think that.”

Gohmert: “Well I’m just looking for evidence, and normally we’re known by our fruits, and there have been no indications that it was a big deal, because your department has still not been forthcoming in producing the documents that were the subject of the contempt.”

Holder: “The documents that we were prepared to make available then, we’re prepared to make available now that would have obviated the whole need. This was all about the gun lobby and a desire to have a—

Gohmert: “Sir, we’ve been trying to get to the bottom of Fast and Furious where people died, where at least a couple hundred Mexicans died, and we can’t get the information to get to the bottom of that, so I don’t need lectures from you about contempt, because it is very difficult to deal with asking questions.”

Holder: “And I don’t need lectures from you either.”

Gohmert: “As a former judge, I’d never have asked questions of someone who’s been held in contempt. We waited ‘til the contempt was purged, and then we asked questions.”

(H/T Melanie Hunter at CNS News)

So either AG Holder and Congressman Louie Gohmert are “Buddies” or Eric Holder is an Arrogant A-Hole.  May be both.

Hmmm…

Considering We the People wish to see Lois Lerner of IRS Targeting Political Enemies Fame placed in Contempt… it’s worth wondering what power that charge actually has?

If you’re found guilty of Contempt of Congress such as Eric Holder has been, So What?

I’m pretty sure I would be put in Jail.

I guess if you’re associated with Government, you become Buddies.  You also Demonstrate for all of us out here Who still Give a Crap that you’re Above the Law.

And when You’re the one in charge of Enforcing the Law where does that leave us?


Hillary and I Agree on Something…

Or, In The Garden of Good and Evil.

Why do Progressives have such a difficult time with Good vs. Evil?

This came to mind after reading Hillary’s statement regarding Putin’s Actions resembling Hitler… A statement I happen to agree with on a number of levels, from the fostering of National Identity by positioning the World as an antagonist (Very Machiavellian) to Vlad’s demonstrated wish to Expand his countries borders under the guise of “protecting” Ethnic Russians.  I personally made such a statement several days ago.

But what I can’t quite reconcile is Why Now is a Prominent Democrat seeing it Clearly? Well, I can when it comes to Hillary 2016… But I still find it interesting as a larger question.  Hillary First…

So Why would Mrs. Clinton suddenly find Putin’s Socialist/Fascist Behavior to be Hitleresque?

There are exactly Two reasons.

A.  It’s election time and she knows the rest of us find Putin’s behavior repugnant. It’s always good to be on the same side of stuff as the people whom you want voting for you.

B.  It’s yet another attempt to separate the behavior of Fascists from the “wholesome, for your own good, because we care about you” Democrat Socialism.

But What about the Rank and File Socialists?  How do They deal with Putin’s actions?

For decades the Left in this country has faced difficult Positions to Champion.

They have made Excuses for what is demonstrably the Single most Destructive Ideology the planet has ever known in terms of Human Life or Pointed a finger at the only Economic Paradigm, Free Market Capitalism, which has lifted Billions out of Poverty, Saved Lives and Protected the Planet then Screamed “Exploitation”.

Every moment of every day Liberals must defend the very Ideology which has wrought Death and Destruction of all that is Good and then blame Sociaty’s Ill on Society itself.  This fact explains their difficulty with Good and Evil when they try to identify it.  It explains why they find themselves on “The Same Side of History” as Lenin, Mao, Stalin, Chavez, Castro, Guevara, Stalin, Ho Chi Min, Pol Pot, Mugabe, FDR, etc. etc. etc.  Their excuses have necessarily been born of Moral Relativity, Pragmatism and preservation of Power.

The Horror’s practiced by the above Leaders, and Millions of their Followers, must always be excused with the Good intentions which precipitated them or the Failure of the Individual.  The innate flaws of Man must be personalized and frozen… then isolated in order to not find Responsibility in the Ideology… in Themselves.

The Forced Failures of Socialist Planners is excused by blaming Individuals who are not smart enough to understand the benefits, Ephemeral acts of the Universe whose Consciousness fails to recognize the Brilliance of Those Who Proclaimed the Prescience of knowing the way forward for the Unwashed Masses, or Both.

As far as Hillary seeing Putin for what he is, She remains a Socialist.

Hillary longs to be the Leader of Those Who Make Excuses for Evil.  To Be a Liberal… She Must.

While It’s Interesting that One Who Champions Force recognizes It as Evil…

Unless a Change of Mind Occurs and That person decides to Champion the Individual, in other words What is Good,

It just isn’t Very Valuable.

Hillary may see Putin’s Actions as Evil… but just can’t really explain Why.


Questions from the Chris Christie Barbeque

I have taken the transcripts from the Chris Christie Inquisition which occurred in New Jersey over the artificial traffic jam created by some in his office.

I’ve held off several days to let it all shake out… frankly the use of government power to do these types of things is unacceptable regardless of who is doing it.  But that isn’t my point with this post.  I will also not be delving into the obvious “didn’t the press get the message that all of this was to be saved until Christie was the Nominee” problem the Democrats have.

The point here is:

Where are these questions for President Obama regarding Fast and Furious… Benghazi… NSA Domestic Spying… Political Targeting by the IRS

Do these reporters only exist in New Jersey?

Here are some of my favorite Questions (Bold and Italics are mine… replace “Governor” with “Mr. President”, replace “U.S. Attorney” with “Constitutional Law Professor” and you can replace the below actors with Holder, Clinton, Clapper et al. for effect.)

Governor, beyond the apology and the terminations that you’ve announced, what other steps — concrete steps do you plan to take to demonstrate to the people of New Jersey and the people of the country that you want to change the perception of what has happened here? And will that include working cooperatively with these investigations that are now moving forward because in the past you had some rather nasty words for the people who were heading them up?

Your critics say this reveals that you are a political bully, that your style is payback. Are you? And does this compromise your ability to serve?

Governor, you say that you’re going to individually interview all the members of the governor’s office.  What about the campaign? Are you going to — are you going to personally interview —

How confident are you that this doesn’t rise above Bill Stepien in the campaign?  But there were plenty of other officials, some of them quite close to you.  You’re sure that they didn’t know about?

How confident are you that this tactic — this bullying tactic, this revenge/retribution tactic — did not go beyond — (off mic)?  But you can tell us that you do not authorize this kind of retribution.

Can you understand why people would have a hard time believing that you didn’t know about this thing? Considering your management style and the closeness of your staff, if you didn’t know about it, what does that say about your ability to lead?

Governor, the U.S. attorney in New Jersey has said he’s opening an investigation to determine whether a federal law was violated here. You were the U.S. attorney in New Jersey at one time. Would you, as a U.S. attorney — would you think that there’s anything to be investigated — (off mic) —

Are there any other — are there any other cases — have you asked from your staff if there are any other cases of political retribution conducted during your campaign to other mayors — (in New Jersey ?)?  (Inaudible) — now that you know it did happen?

You say you’re going to continue to ask these questions of your staff. I want to know what kind of questions you might be asking of yourself. These aren’t just any of the 65,000 employees, these are people — five or six people as close to you as you can get — people you trust — (inaudible) — to your birthday party, and they either —  Went to a birthday party.  One of your staff — (one of the ?) staffers you fired this morning  So, I’m just asking, what do you ask yourself about — they either thought this is what the boss wanted, or they — as a group, they were willing to go rogue and do this and then try to cover it up — (inaudible) —

Governor, the mayor of Jersey City is quoted as saying that today he declined to endorse you and said he would vote Democrat, and as many as 10 appointments between state officials and Jersey City officials were cancelled suddenly, all at once.  How do you explain that in the context of what you now know about what some of your staff did?

Yeah, I heard that you actually — when your staff read the Bergen Record and learned something in terms of situational awareness, does the universal apology to the state of New Jersey include the press corps?

I’m wondering what your staff said to you about why they lied to you. Why would they do that? What was their explanation? And what about Mr. Samson? What role did he play in this?

Governor, you mentioned earlier that — (off mic) — asking the question is what did I — (off mic) — lie to me, but are you also asking the question, what did I say or how did I conduct myself in the office to behave in a way that would lend these folks to think it was OK to carry out such a scheme like this? (Off mic) — that suspicions that (you fostered ?) — (off mic) — through your administration or your campaign that allowed people to think it was OK to intimidate or retaliate against people?

(Off mic) — apologize to the (road men ?) there. Are you going to also apologize for the joke you made — (off mic) —  What prompted you to joke about it in the —

(Off mic) — your campaign, did you guys every (sic) go into and say that this is what happens if you endorse us?

Governor, you said you had been doing some soul-searching. I’m wondering if you’re soul-searching about the kind of people you hire, or the kind of people who run your campaigns, or the kind of people you want to run the Republican Party who are willing to apparently engage in political retribution and also call the mayor reportedly a racially insensitive man.

(Off mic) — how much of a crisis in confidence — (off mic) — people you surrounding yourself with and your ability to accept future leadership roles?

Governor — (off mic) — just found out about — (off mic) — story. Is that just a misstatement, or —

OK. The (other thing is ?), in terms of drilling down down now that you’ve been able to get a handle a little bit more on — (off mic) — what happened (then ?)? Was there a threat or an ask for an endorsement? Was there then retribution?

So you still don’t know what prompted an apparent vendetta? OK.

Two questions about your judgment. You said clearly that you had nothing to do with the actual implementation of what happened. So are you now questioning your own judgment about whether or not you can discern with your nose for scandal — to discern whether or not putting out a series of cones to change a couple of lanes of traffic was actually a legitimate traffic study, one?

So in this environment, it didn’t raise a smell for you?

You’ve said — you’ve said that — just a moment ago that sometimes this raises to the level of governors. There’s a report now that in fact you called Governor Cuomo to complain that your representative on the Port Authority board was asking too many questions — (inaudible) —

Governor, didn’t Pat Foye perjure himself when he said he didn’t believe this traffic study — (inaudible) — did he lie under oath — (inaudible)

(Off mic) — right? You still think everything he said was genuine and that he’s not in any way —

Why didn’t you check back — (off mic)? You never called him to see —

(Off mic) — with Stepien yesterday, what was going on, why he —

(Are you not curious ?) — (off mic) — what happened here yourself?  I mean, it has come out —

What about — what about the cover-up piece of this?

There are multiple reports that an elderly woman in — (inaudible) — died after emergency — (inaudible). What’s your reaction?

Governor, along the lines of doing the job as governor that you have said that you’re focused on — regaining the trust of the people of New Jersey — a lot of people are upset about this and shocked. The first couple of years you were governor, you did a lot of town hall meetings. You traveled all over the state and spoke to people. Any thought about possibly trying to do something like that again?  (Editor note: Could you imagine the President going on a town hall type tour to promote Obama Care let alone even being asked to do so?)

Governor, as a U.S. attorney, you — (off mic) –hundreds if not thousands of people.  So how could you fail to get the truth from your own staff?

Governor, you were a U.S. attorney, very high-profile, in fact investigated one governor — (off mic) — governor’s office and a state party. You now are a governor who has a U.S. attorney investigating people that (sic) were connected to your office. What instructions are you giving, have you given to your staff? What will you do? And can we expect to see claims of executive privilege and, no — (off mic) — you cannot have documents, or are you going to cooperate fully and very helpfully?

In terms of — it seems like your fact-finding is still getting some momentum. You’re still finding out what’s going on. Do you think this could have an impact and you should put on hold — (off mic) — O’Dowd’s nomination to be the attorney general since he was the chief of staff and would probably be involved in setting the tone?

You mentioned this as we saw from the emails, that too much of this discussion was taking place on private email accounts. Have you asked your staff to stop communicating government business on private email accounts?

Have you requested any more documents?

Bridget Kelly, did she have the authorization to carry out significant policy decisions such as an authorization of the governor’s office — (off mic) — or funding without getting prior approval from you or your senior staff — (off mic) — authorized to make those decisions?

(Inaudible) — supposition, or as a follow-up question, is that I believe there is — (inaudible) — that some share that they find it hard to believe that Bridget could be — would be making these kind of calls, making these kinds of decisions, as reflected in the email that we saw yesterday, without prior approval, without the knowledge of senior staff.

Governor, you just said — (off mic) — I have nothing to hide, and then you repeated “I have nothing to hide”.  In your long public career at the U.S. Attorney’s Office, first term as governor, second term now, did you ever imagine you’d stand in front of this many cameras and this many reporters and have to say, I have nothing to hide?

Governor, obviously this has been a traumatic experience. You said you got very little if any sleep whatsoever last night. Did you ever for even a brief moment entertain the idea that perhaps you should resign?  (Editor note:  The reporter left out “Or kill yourself?”  Can you again imagine this being asked by the DC Press Corp?)

There were some folks that raised an eyebrow — (off mic) — with Mr. Baroni’s resignation at the news conference where you had asked — (off mic) — replaced by Deborah Gramiccioni, but that was something that was in the works and that you were trying to advance. Looking back on it now — (off mic) — clarify how that process played out, do you think Mr. Baroni was jumping ship a little bit here, trying to get out — (off mic) — political — were you guys moving to replace him before that news conference?

Governor, a couple of hours after the story broke yesterday, the assembly transportation boss, Wisniewski, was discussing the fact that the more he learns about this — he’s reading thousands of pages of documents — the longer the list was growing of people he would be thinking about issuing a subpoena to. And he was asked if that could possibly include you.

And he said he had the authority to issue a subpoena to anybody who he needs to get information from. If you were to get a subpoena, for whatever reason, what would you do?

Governor, the revealing nature of these emails made some of us wonder what else — what other emails — (off mic). (Off mic) — filed a number of requests for emails related to this, and they were told there was nothing available. And yet these emails that were released yesterday reveal that there — (off mic) — related to this issue. Is there a — did you know about that? Is there a transparency issue in general — (off mic)?

Governor, I’m wondering when you were first called for comment on the story, and whether you think this will affect your ability at the — (off mic).

— throughout this entire press conference you’ve said that you’re a loyal person, you expect loyalty, and you fired this person on your staff because she lied. Are you the victim here, or is — are the people of Fort Lee the victim? Should she have been fired because she ordered a traffic study that messed up traffic and put people in danger in that sense —- traffic problems.

Governor Christie, but one of the things is that in terms of a lying standpoint, the very person who has probably these most information about why she did this is the very person you cut off communication with. Isn’t that a management mistake?

Well, I’m saying talk to her. I mean, in terms of the conversation, like why did you do this? Get some information.

Like tampering with a witness — (inaudible)?  (Editor note: !)

(Inaudible) — something though about — (inaudible) — what point does political misconduct cross into criminality?

(Off mic) — that these people with emails — (off mic). These emails say that they took action in front of your constituents to try to — (off mic). They focused on the — (off mic) — but they did something that conned your constituents.

Is your credibility — (off mic)?

So — (off mic) — David Wildstein, is it possible that there could be other emails that Bridget Kelly may have shipped — have sent about this issue to other people — (off mic) — Port Authority, in your administration that you don’t know about at this time? And are you going to take– make an effort to look at computers and BlackBerrys and things like that in (her ?) office to see if these things are — (off mic)?

Governor, one of the things — (off mic) — this impression that you’re not sort of — (inaudible). And a lot of your opponents will use this as a — sort of — (inaudible) — like, see, we got you. You know, it’s always the same. Is there any level of political retribution that is acceptable and — (inaudible)?

Governor, there have been other examples of allegations of improper political behavior by state government — I’m thinking particularly about the Hunterdon county sheriff whose case was taken from the county prosecutor — (off mic) — knowing what you know now about, you know, your staffer lying to you, are you going to go back and look at some of those other situations and see what — (off mic) —

The mayor did say at one point there was some significant overtime involved for first responders in terms of police. Is that something that you would consider to — (off mic) — campaign fund, to reimburse — (off mic)?

Since I Cherry Picked… Full Transcript Here.

Keep in mind, it’s not Just the questions it’s the follow-up and order of the questions.  It the fact that there were NO softballs.  Not a single reporter asked him if this was “the toughest day of his life” or “How is your family holding up?” etc.

I’m sure that this tenacity has nothing to do with Christie being a Republican, even if he is one in name only.


And yet Another Leftist with a Gun?

Apparently the latest shooting Colorado is another young uninformed leftist with a gun.

At what point will we prohibit Socialists from possessing firearms?

Leftists kill.

And Kill.

And Kill.

It’s time to put a stop to Liberal gun ownership.  Private gun shops must start administering psych profiles with the intent to limit Liberals from owning and having access to weapons.


Socialist Success Stories

Below is a list of Socialism’s Success Stories: