Tag Archives: charlie hebdo

4 out of 5 Socialists Recommend Controlling Speech

In a Recent unscientific Survey 4 out of 5 Socialists said they believe Offensive Speech should be Controlled.

Rather than stand on Principle and cast Sunshine on supposedly ‘deadly’ speech expressed in newspapers, television and the internet thus allowing All if Us to condemn it…  Our Government prefers to sidestep that argument and ask for Increased Control of all methods of expression.

Why?

Because controlling Speech is an important weapon employed by those in power to remain in power.

Think about it this way; If you’re doing things people hate you for, what better way to avoid their anger than to make sure they never know about it… and if they do find out, you can tell them whatever you want while making sure nobody can challenge your hogwash.  If anyone tries to shed light on your crappy behavior anyway… send some Force their way.

Brilliant!

Of course you need to convince enough people these controls ‘are for their own good’ or, in pure Irony, ‘to safeguard Free Speech’.  Those that support you, for whatever unimaginable reason, will nod in agreement.  They might even grab a Starbucks, Stop Bathing, Misspell a Sign and Sit in a Park.  Get enough Useful Types like these and you’ve inoculated yourself against all those who recognize the danger you represent.  Machiavelli would be Proud.

We are seeing this play out right in front of us.

New Controls are being created for the Internet.  Last time I checked the Internet has done pretty well without them…

It Keeps getting Faster…  It Keeps getting Better… all by Private Means.

But it represents all that Socialists believe is Evil.

Free Speech.

And that cannot be tolerated.

If you can’t make fun of someone’s Faith, what Can you make fun of?

And since Socialism/Populism/Liberalism often serves as Religion for Atheists… it’s not even a jump, leap or reach.

By the way, the Fifth Socialist who didn’t Approve of Controlling Speech is having his Mind made Right by the other 4 as I type this out.


When it’s not an Argument you want to have…

When you’re a Liberal and you clearly see the danger in defending Free Speech…

When a Socialist is placed in a position having to feign outrage over the motivations of terrorists when they kill those who have done nothing more than draw cartoons…

What do you do?

Liam Neeson Demonstrates:

Action Hero Liam Neeson on Paris Attack: US Gun Ownership ‘A [Bleeping] Disgrace’

When you’re Liberal Progressive who see’s the possibility of the narrative going the wrong way…

What do you do?

Washington Post Columnist Eugene Robinson Demonstrates:

Eugene Robinson:  France Attacks would be Deadlier in US Due to Guns

When you’re a Democratic Socialist and you recognize Control of Speech is one of the most powerful weapons you have when it comes to defending yourself from your population…

What do you do?

Paris Demonstrates how it has no word for Irony in French… or is it in ‘Marxist’?:

France ordered prosecutors around the country to crack down on hate speech, anti-Semitism and glorifying terrorism, announcing Wednesday that 54 people had been arrested for those offenses since terror attacks last week left 20 dead in Paris.

 

Leftists cannot allow the power to control speech to slip through their fingers after working so diligently to get the public to support it…

Genuinely Free Speech would be a defeat taking decades for Socialists to recover from.

 


Radical Islam is not the Problem

or

Denial is a River that Runs through the White House.

Today the White House made a growing list of statements following the Murders at Charlie Hebdo in Paris, and continued to refuse to name Radical Islam as the root of the terrorist acts.

Did I miss something?

Have we witnessed 30-years of Radical Capitalists or Constitutional Loyalists bombing and beheading innocent civilians?

If so would someone please list these events for me in the comments section?

If I recall, the First Step is to Admit you have a problem.  You can’t get to the other 11 without completing the First One.

This supposedly Enlightened, Superior approach of Silent Lucidiocy is doing nothing but enabling the Islamo-Fascists to kill an ever-increasing number of people.  While the Governing Ideology of the day would love to find Terrorists in those that believe Constitutionally Limited Government and Fiscal Responsibility are Good Ideas… but those folks thinking such ‘nonsense’ are not Killing People.

Call it what it is.

Those Muslim’s that take offense are Free to Join us in combating this overt Terror Threat.

I’m open to changing my mind… but only with New Information.

And, right now there is nothing New here.


You either believe in Free Speech… or you do not.

From Breitbart:  WH Declines ‘Absolute Support’ for the Right to Satirical Mockery

Once again… that damned U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.

All it does is get in the way of Socialism.

It’s SO outdated!  The Founders could never have imagined the types of Satirical Mockery we have today!

I mean Cartoons and Newspapers!  Who would have thought?!

Free Speech does not mean only the Speech you agree with.  In fact, it means Only the Speech you disagree with, as the Speech you agree with needs no protection.

So important is this fact that the Founders put it FIRST… followed by the Amendment designed to ensure its protection.

If you don’t believe speech should be free you have the rest of the world to control what other people say.  Go there.